Game Theory Lab: Payoffs and Best Responses

Edit a two-player payoff matrix to find best responses, strict dominance, and pure-strategy Nash equilibria.

Free, with no sign-up.

For High school students and adults reviewing the topic.

About 10 minutes.

How does it work?

  1. Change the controls or open a named preset. Read the outputs, then check a challenge.

What will you get?

Compare the model’s outputs and check two challenges.

What does the model assume?

  • Two players choose simultaneously between two strategies each. A payoff pair lists Row’s payoff first and Column’s second.
  • Larger payoffs are preferred. Numbers are illustrative utility values, not money or a forecast.
  • A best response includes tied maximizers. Strict dominance requires a strictly higher payoff against each opposing strategy.
  • A pure-strategy equilibrium permits no profitable unilateral change. This model does not calculate mixed-strategy equilibria.
  • An equilibrium is marked as improvable when another cell gives both players strictly higher payoffs; this is a comparison of outcomes, not a predicted agreement.

Which setup would you like to try?

What can you change?

Range: -10 to 10 utility.

Range: -10 to 10 utility.

Range: -10 to 10 utility.

Range: -10 to 10 utility.

Range: -10 to 10 utility.

Range: -10 to 10 utility.

Range: -10 to 10 utility.

Range: -10 to 10 utility.

What does the model predict?

QuantityValueUnit
Row’s best response to LeftDown
Row’s best response to RightDown
Column’s best response to UpRight
Column’s best response to DownRight
Row’s strictly dominant strategyDown
Column’s strictly dominant strategyRight
Pure-strategy Nash equilibriaDown, Right
Equilibria with an outcome better for bothDown, Right
Payoff matrix
ColumnLeftRightRowUpDown3, 30, 5★5★, 01★, 1★

Payoffs are Row, Column. A star marks a best response to the other player’s choice; two stars identify an equilibrium. A dashed outline marks an equilibrium cell.

Can you reach these targets?

Keep the other prisoner’s-dilemma payoffs shown below. Change the two Up-Left payoffs so Up and Left become strict best responses to one another.

  • Target: Row payoff at Up, Right = 0 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Column payoff at Up, Right = 5 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Row payoff at Down, Left = 5 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Column payoff at Down, Left = 0 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Row payoff at Down, Right = 1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Column payoff at Down, Right = 1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Row’s best response to Left (Up)
  • Column’s best response to Up (Left)

Reproduce the displayed matching-payoff game with no pure-strategy equilibrium.

  • Target: Row payoff at Up, Left = 1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Column payoff at Up, Left = -1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Row payoff at Up, Right = -1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Column payoff at Up, Right = 1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Row payoff at Down, Left = -1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Column payoff at Down, Left = 1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Row payoff at Down, Right = 1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Target: Column payoff at Down, Right = -1 utility; tolerance 0 utility.
  • Pure-strategy Nash equilibria (No pure-strategy equilibrium)
Read the topic guide